This is too good not to post! Someone made it and posted it on facebook and I saved it to my computer. I can’t seem to find the link to where it was posted though :-(.. and I can’t find any websites that have the image 🙁

## Lord of the Rings Math

Posted by mathfail
on January 5, 2010

This is too good not to post! Someone made it and posted it on facebook and I saved it to my computer. I can’t seem to find the link to where it was posted though :-(.. and I can’t find any websites that have the image 🙁

Would’ve been better if the range was in set builder notation.

1 0

VERTICAL ASYMPTOTES FTW!!!!!!

1 0

Equation should look more like y=-1/(x-gandalf) 😛

1 0

try tineye.com0 0

Domain and range are also incorrect, should be:

Domain = R\{Gandalf}

Range = R\{0}

0 0

Writing it in English is just as correct as writing it in mathematical notation. Yes, it’s bad practice, but it’s no less right.

1 0

That’s a better version, done by the original artist.

0 2

no it’s actually wrong

the domain should be: [-inf,gandalf]u[gandalf,+inf]

and the range should be: [-inf,inf]

the picture shows a vertical asymptote. this is related to domain values, not range values. if it were a horizontal asymptote, then it would be in respect to the range.

1 0

This equation is an epic win

1 0

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

0 6

yes. yes, we would, if u have a problem with it you should just leave

1 0

Hoooooooly cow, I drew this my senior year of high school, way back in 2009. I never thought I’d see it again. Damn.

0 2

Nerd out time

This wouldn’t actually be x^balrog

It would actually be f(x)=(-balrog/(x-2)) or maybe tangent(balrog*(x-c))

where b is the distance from the Y axis of the asymptote.

and c is |b-pi/2|

0 0