zoltan dulac April 6, 2010 at 1:02 pm I thought of “For everyone there is someone”, but I’m not sure …. Tell me the answer. It is driving me nuts!
bobthecarrot April 20, 2010 at 5:39 pm For all ∀’s, there exists an ∃… because you rarely if ever see a proof with one but not the other. Cute. Made me smile =)
5.00 (3 votes)
Loading... 5.00 (3 votes)Loading...
I don’t get it. please explain
I thought of “For everyone there is someone”, but I’m not sure ….
Tell me the answer. It is driving me nuts!
For all ∀’s, there exists an ∃… because you rarely if ever see a proof with one but not the other. Cute. Made me smile =)
Now I get it! Neat!